http://blakesamic.disqus.com/enMon, 13 Oct 2008 20:19:42 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2008/09/04/finding-value-social-network-recommendations/#comment-3031802<p>Hey what's up everyone? I ended up going with the Canon SD750 (<a href="http://flickr.com/cameras/canon/powershot_sd750/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://flickr.com/cameras/canon/powershot_sd750/)">http://flickr.com/cameras/c...</a> Thanks again for the advice!</p>Blake SamicMon, 13 Oct 2008 20:19:42 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2008/09/04/finding-value-social-network-recommendations/#comment-2220413<p>Basically, I had a <a href="http://flickr.com/cameras/casio/ex-s880/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://flickr.com/cameras/casio/ex-s880/">Casio EX-S880</a>. It took some great pictures, and I was also very impressed with the videos. But (and this is a big "but"), it flaked out and stopped working one day. The lens extended when I turned the camera on, it made a few noises, then retracted and turned off. I sent it to Casio and they "fixed" it under their 1 year warranty. It worked again for a month or so and the same problem popped up again. I sent it back because it was still about 7 months from the original purchase date, but they didn't honor it this time. They said it had a scratch on it that showed misuse - but it looked identical to the first time I sent it in. They offered to sell me a refurb model of the same camera for another $200. No way. Why would I pay another $200 for a camera that broke on me twice? I told them to send me back my broken camera.</p>Blake SamicSun, 07 Sep 2008 20:11:51 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2008/09/04/finding-value-social-network-recommendations/#comment-2098972<p>I'm going to have to agree with Ryan... It would be interesting to see why I shouldn't go down the Casio route!!</p>Kevin AlbersWed, 03 Sep 2008 23:53:39 -0000