http://blakesamic.disqus.com/enWed, 11 Feb 2009 11:39:37 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-6179501I realy wouldn't know but I think a latin name should be the bestgreen cheeked conureWed, 11 Feb 2009 11:39:37 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-3487522Update... if you haven't noticed, I never changed the name. I've decided to stick with <a href="http://blakesamic.com" rel="nofollow">blakesamic.com</a>.B_SamicTue, 04 Nov 2008 10:53:39 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978371<a href="http://Poopordie.org" rel="nofollow">Poopordie.org</a>P ReddySat, 02 Feb 2008 14:46:48 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978370Old School:<br><br><a href="http://slakebamic.com" rel="nofollow">slakebamic.com</a>WillTue, 02 Oct 2007 10:57:42 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978369Yeah I think I want something without my name in it at all... just some kind of meaningful phraseB_SamicSun, 16 Sep 2007 15:57:51 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978368<a href="http://www.thinkwrite.us" rel="nofollow">www.thinkwrite.us</a>tadSun, 16 Sep 2007 15:54:15 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978367what about <a href="http://BlakeTime.com" rel="nofollow">BlakeTime.com</a> ?B_SamicThu, 13 Sep 2007 22:14:29 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978366I think your blog is wonderful. I don't know what insight I can offer as to a name for your blog....maybe <a href="http://Blakesview.com" rel="nofollow">Blakesview.com</a> it is owned by go daddy right now but can be purchased for about six dollars. .....or maybe just <a href="http://BlakeView.com" rel="nofollow">BlakeView.com</a> .....idk ...lolJulieThu, 13 Sep 2007 20:52:10 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978365<a href="http://homo.com" rel="nofollow">homo.com</a>steveTue, 11 Sep 2007 20:08:12 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978364<a href="http://www.creedsthoughts.gov/www.creedsthoughts.com" rel="nofollow">www.creedsthoughts.gov/www.creedsthoughts.com</a>BernieKnightTue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:38 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978363I think some how you should tie your new site in with <a href="http://www.Fratnimals.co.uk" rel="nofollow">www.Fratnimals.co.uk</a>. I feel as though your site could benefit from our support.<br><br>so I say:<br><br><a href="http://SlakeBtheSloth.net" rel="nofollow">http://SlakeBtheSloth.net</a>BernieKnightTue, 11 Sep 2007 17:04:47 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978362Amsterslamic.com?B_SamicTue, 11 Sep 2007 15:18:27 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978361BlakedoesBelguim.com? <br><br>Seehowmanypicturesflickrcantakeineurope.com?Dan #2Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:29:10 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978360What about:<br><a href="http://blickr.com" rel="nofollow">blickr.com</a><br><a href="http://slickr.com" rel="nofollow">slickr.com</a><br><a href="http://bslickr.com" rel="nofollow">bslickr.com</a><br>blakesamic.org/asmGravesTue, 11 Sep 2007 14:25:37 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978359out of the ideas so far, <a href="http://slakebamic.com" rel="nofollow">slakebamic.com</a> is the clear winner.... I don't do "www" though. That's lame Tad.<br><br>What about something without my name at all...maybe some sort of meaningful phrase?B_SamicTue, 11 Sep 2007 09:00:16 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978358Update : <a href="http://slamic.com" rel="nofollow">slamic.com</a> is already taken!tadMon, 10 Sep 2007 07:45:36 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978357i like dan's suggestion! <br><br>what about something like <br><a href="http://www.slamic.com" rel="nofollow">www.slamic.com</a><br><a href="http://www.blamic.com" rel="nofollow">www.blamic.com</a><br><a href="http://www.slakebamic.com" rel="nofollow">www.slakebamic.com</a> (this one provides the perfect compliment to <a href="http://blakesamic.com" rel="nofollow">blakesamic.com</a>)tadMon, 10 Sep 2007 07:44:59 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978356I like the sound of that (and I already own the domain name)...but I'm not sure if it's appropriate for the ideas I'm trying to convey.B_SamicMon, 10 Sep 2007 01:07:41 -0000http://blakesamic.com/2007/09/10/new-blog-name/#comment-1978355how about <a href="http://chicagosbesthotdogs.com" rel="nofollow">chicagosbesthotdogs.com</a>DanMon, 10 Sep 2007 00:59:19 -0000